Re: HELP! Port seems to be ignored in cfg file -- what am I doing wrong?
From: Antonio Paulo Salgado Forster (
)
Date: Thu May 30 2002 - 22:32:51 EDT
not sure about the port problem, but anyway, you dont need to specify the
username... just a blank space after the *= is enough.. all users will
match the rule.
"Jon R. Kibler" <
>@HUMMINGBIRD.COM> on 05/30/2002
11:28:27 AM
Please respond to "Title: Socks-Users" <
>
Sent by: "Title: Socks-Users" <
>
To:
cc:
Subject: HELP! Port seems to be ignored in cfg file -- what am I doing
wrong?
Running Win/NT4.0SP6, SOCKS 7.101:
Config file C:\Program Files\Hummingbird Electronic
Media\7.10\SOCKS\System32\Hummingbird\Connectivity\7.10\Socks\socks.cfg is
as follows:
BIND-MODULE *
PROXY-NAME @=10.5.2.1:61080
DIRECT 10.5.2.0 255.255.255.0
SOCKD5 @=10.5.2.1:61080 *=abc 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
SOCKD5 @=10.5.2.1:61080 *=edf 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
SOCKD5 @=10.5.2.1:61080 *=ghi 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
SOCKD5 @=10.5.2.1:61080 *=jkl 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
DENY 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
After making the config change of socks to server port 61080 (and I have
tried other port #s as well), rebooted windows, tried to open a socks
connection, but socks still tries to connect on port 1080. Ran snoop on a
sun box and watched network traffic. Regardless of port assignment, socks
seems to always go out on the LAN to the server on port 1080. (Changing IP
address works, but not changing port!)
Is this a bug in HCL client or do I have something stupidly wrong in the
above config?
Feedback needed!! HELP!!!
Thanks in advance for assistance.
Jon Kibler
ASET, Inc.
Charleston, SC USA
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Fri May 31 2002 - 23:54:02 EDT
|
